Human rights activists have criticised the Nigerian government’s stance on the death penalty for terrorism-related offences, saying the position lacks clarity and moral consistency. They argue that while terrorism continues to claim innocent lives, government policies on punishment appear weak and confusing, leaving victims without a sense of justice.

According to the activists, Nigeria’s reluctance to firmly enforce capital punishment for terrorists is partly influenced by pressure from foreign governments, especially the United States. They claim that Western powers often discourage the death penalty on human rights grounds, even as African countries struggle with violent extremism and insecurity.

The campaigners insist that Nigeria must prioritise its national security over external opinions. They believe that strong laws, including the death penalty where applicable, could serve as a deterrent to terrorism and restore public confidence in the justice system. However, they also stress the need for fair trials and respect for due process.

While acknowledging global debates around human rights, the activists urged the Nigerian government to adopt policies that reflect local realities. They called for a balanced approach that protects human rights but also delivers justice to victims of terrorism and ensures lasting peace across the country.