A human rights lawyer has raised alarm over what he describes as clear bias from a presiding judge handling one of his ongoing cases. According to him, several recent rulings and courtroom decisions suggest unfair treatment, creating doubts about the judge’s neutrality and commitment to justice. He explained that the pattern of judgments has put him at a disadvantage, making it difficult for his client to get a fair hearing.

The lawyer stated that he had formally reported the matter to the appropriate judicial authorities, hoping for intervention before the case progresses further. He noted that judges are expected to remain impartial, and any appearance of personal interest or prejudice can undermine public trust. His complaint includes claims that the judge consistently dismisses his applications without proper consideration.

Legal observers say this kind of allegation highlights the growing concern about transparency and accountability within the judiciary. Many argue that every litigant deserves an unbiased judge, and complaints like this should be thoroughly investigated. They believe that restoring confidence in the courts requires strong disciplinary actions where misconduct is proven.

Meanwhile, the public is reacting to the lawyer’s outcry, calling for a fair review and insisting that justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done. Advocacy groups are urging the judiciary to address the issue quickly to avoid further controversy. As the case continues, all eyes remain on the judicial panel expected to review the lawyer’s petition.