In a significant move that has raised concerns about press freedom in Nigeria, the federal government has filed charges against nine journalists for allegedly publishing false information about a purported siege by the Department of State Services (DSS) at the National Assembly. This siege was reported to be linked to discussions surrounding the potential impeachment of Senate President Godswill Akpabio.
The charges were filed on October 21, 2024, in the Federal High Court in Abuja, marked as FHC/ABJ/CR/555/2024. The Deputy Director of Public Prosecution, A. A. Yusuf, represents the government in this case. The defendants include:
The online platform where the alleged false information was published.
Founder, publisher, and Executive Director of Order Paper.
Head of Operations.
Admin/Finance Executive.
National Assembly lead reporter and author of the report.
Other staff members, including Regina Udo, Leah Twaki, Idongesit Joseph Ekoh, and Edoesomi Sharon Omonegho.
The journalists are facing six counts that include serious accusations such as:
Under Section 24(1)(a) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, Etc.) Act 2015, the defendants are accused of knowingly publishing false information about the DSS’s actions regarding the National Assembly.
Under Section 24(1)(b) of the same act, they are charged with intentionally publishing defamatory statements about the DSS and Senate President Akpabio.
There are two counts under Section 375 of the Criminal Code Act, claiming that the defendants published defamatory material about both the DSS and Akpabio.
This charge, under Section 59 of the Criminal Code Act, addresses the intent behind their actions to allegedly incite public fear.
The final charge states that the defendants conspired to disseminate false information regarding the DSS.
The report that triggered these charges was published on October 16, 2024, and claimed that the DSS had taken drastic actions in the National Assembly due to the impeachment discussions concerning Akpabio. This report quickly spread and raised alarm among the public, prompting the government to respond with legal action.
The implications of these charges are significant. They not only highlight the government’s approach to controlling information and managing public perception but also pose a serious threat to journalistic integrity and freedom in Nigeria. Media professionals and watchdog organizations have expressed concern that this legal action may lead to increased self-censorship among journalists, fearing similar repercussions for reporting on sensitive political issues.
As of now, no date has been set for the arraignment of the defendants, leaving many questions unanswered about the future of press freedom in Nigeria. The case will likely attract considerable public attention and debate about the balance between national security, political stability, and the fundamental right to free speech.
This legal battle underscores a troubling trend in many countries, where governments take legal action against media professionals who report on matters of public interest. As the case unfolds, it will be crucial for observers and advocates of press freedom to monitor the proceedings closely and support the journalists involved.
