The United States has announced its decision to withdraw from 66 international and global organisations as part of a major review of its foreign policy priorities. The move is aimed at cutting costs, reducing overseas commitments, and refocusing on national interests at home.

US officials said many of the organisations no longer serve America’s strategic or economic goals. Some were described as ineffective, outdated, or not aligned with the country’s current policy direction. The government also believes that pulling out will save billions of dollars and allow funds to be redirected to domestic needs.

However, the decision has attracted criticism from diplomats and global leaders who fear the move could weaken international cooperation. They warn that global challenges like climate change, security, health, and trade require joint efforts, and the absence of the US could reduce the effectiveness of many international bodies.

Supporters of the decision argue that the US should not continue spending heavily on organisations that do not benefit its citizens directly. They insist that the country can still engage with the world through direct partnerships and bilateral agreements without being tied to too many global institutions.