Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has called for the Attorney-General of the Federation, the Director-General of the Department of State Services (DSS), and two prosecution witnesses to be charged with perjury. Kanu’s legal team alleges that these officials provided false statements during his terrorism trial, which they claim has undermined the integrity of the judicial process. They argue that such actions amount to deliberate attempts to mislead the court.

According to his lawyers, the alleged contradictions in the testimonies and official documents presented in court show a pattern of misinformation. They insist that if the government expects fairness from the judiciary, then its representatives must also be held accountable when they give false evidence. Kanu maintains that allowing such alleged perjury to go unpunished sets a dangerous precedent and erodes public trust in the justice system.

The legal team further stressed that the accusations are not just about Kanu’s trial but about protecting the rule of law in Nigeria. They state that perjury by state officials—if proven—undermines justice and violates the rights of any defendant, regardless of the charges. They have asked the court to take immediate steps to investigate the claims and prosecute those responsible.

This development adds another layer of tension to Kanu’s long-standing legal battle. Many Nigerians are watching closely as the case continues to draw national and international attention. The request for prosecution highlights the growing debate over transparency, fairness, and accountability in high-profile security-related trials.